Flunk and subsequently thunk

Year thirteen philosophy recently took a day off to attend our second Candle Conference by Dr. Peter Vardy, hoping to take notes and ideas to use in our study. An early start and a long day would seem to most a dreary way to spend their time for twenty five pounds, but not for us philosophers. Fully caffeinated at nine in the morning, all six of us were excited to see our old pal Vardy again.

sam armstrong

One of the most influential philosophers of our time, Vardy is one of the many thinkers whose ideas and criticisms are studied on the philosophy course, so a day of lectures on a variety of topics was incredibly useful in furthering our bank of scholars from which to draw upon in the exam. Covering the nature of God; Sexual ethics and gender; and secularisation, the Doctor solidified key ideas already in our heads alongside providing us with new ways to go about certain theological and philosophical problems. One such idea is the ‘problem’ of homosexuality in religion, particularly Christianity; while many idle folk would see this an incongruence, including some Christians themselves, Vardy explained how this is most definitely not true when we fully understand the teachings of the religion. In short, the Bible does say homosexuality is wrong, but so is wearing mixed fabrics, and nobody adheres to that, religion has evolved since then. Furthermore, what the Christian scripture really does is denounce sexual pleasure in its entirety, as this takes over and precedes God, which is wrong. Therefore, what the Doctor had shown is that when we truly understand Christian teachings, what it is actually saying we should watch out for is sexual pleasure overriding God, thus homosexuality can be as fully (fully!) coherent with religion as Polyester.

Now while this may sound like ancient nonsense, it is problems like this that not only are at the apex of theological debate in the modern day, but that we have to write about in our exam. Sexual ethics was just one example, and Vardy’s comments on gender represented highly modern views consoled with religion; they debased the flippant and uneducated notion that Christianity is intolerant or incongruent with modern ideas of gender and sexuality, and that in fact it is more encompassing than some modern figureheads portray.

Meeting and listening to Peter Vardy (for the second time) was not only curiously odd, since most philosophers we study have been dead for centuries, but an invaluable experience as part of our general lives and study. Accompanied again by Professor David Webster, Vardy gave us a useful and enjoyable day. Bailey’s Biscuit Bunch adore and abhor contemplation and closed-mindedness respectively, and are always ready for a debate; make our day and question the things around you.

Regards from Sam, Mia, Lucy, Sarah, Paige and Bailey.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s